Note For Anyone Writing About Me

Guide to Writing About Me

I am an Autistic person,not a person with autism. I am also not Aspergers. The diagnosis isn't even in the DSM anymore, and yes, I agree with the consolidation of all autistic spectrum stuff under one umbrella. I have other issues with the DSM.

I don't like Autism Speaks. I'm Disabled, not differently abled, and I am an Autistic activist. Self-advocate is true, but incomplete.

Citing My Posts

MLA: Zisk, Alyssa Hillary. "Post Title." Yes, That Too. Day Month Year of post. Web. Day Month Year of retrieval.

APA: Zisk, A. H. (Year Month Day of post.) Post Title. [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://yesthattoo.blogspot.com/post-specific-URL.

Showing posts with label Autism Rights Watch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Autism Rights Watch. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Double Standards

Trigger Warning: Discussion of abuse, murder of disabled people, silencing

There is this double standard I keep seeing. Autism Speaks is allowed to threaten to sue a minor who makes a parody site. They're allowed to use the work of an autistic person without getting her permission (and apparently without getting the publisher's permission, since I am more willing to believe the publisher than Autism Speaks, honestly. I don't have evidence of the publisher being a liar.) They are allowed mess up the attribution when they do so, calling her an Aspie who found the autism spectrum at eighteen instead of an Autistic diagnosed at age three, several years before Asperger's was even a thing. They're allowed to lie. They're apparently allowed to pretend that I am Autism and Autism Every Day never happened, and that a parent can say they have fantasized about a murder-suicide, killing their autistic kid and themselves without needing to apologize for this. They get to bully autistic adults into silence any way they can. They get give a person money for a personal project and have us expect that his self-advocacy organization isn't going to kowtow to them or silence autistics. (I have specific instances of saying silencing things, and no, intent isn't magical.  Alex, you don't hear the end of it unless you stop doing silencing stuff and apologize for the silencing you've already done, even if you can prove that there is absolutely no link whatsoever between you and Autism Speaks, which I doubt since there is.)
And what do we get? We get told not to even look at a walker's dog when we go protest their walk. We get all the "this fighting between autism organization is sickening" on our articles, our pages, our groups, and none on theirs. We get told that we need to be nicer to parents and maybe they'll see us as human (doesn't work.) We get to answer all kinds of invasive questions about "our individual experiences as people with autism" from people who don't listen to our requests that we be called Autistic people or Autistics instead of people with autism, and we had better well consider it an honor, we ungrateful lot. We get to be oh so thankful to the parents who simultaneously say they would not kill their child and that they understand the other parent who did because an autistic child is just so hard to deal with, that we shouldn't judge. (I will judge anyone who thinks murder is not judging-worthy almost as harshly as I will judge someone who actually murdered, thanks, so don't go telling me not to judge the killer unless you want to be judged next.)
They can do whatever they want and still be saints, near enough. Having to deal with raising one of us gets you that title as far as most of the world is concerned. And you know what? It just isn't so. A parent who abuses their child isn't somehow a saint just because the child they abuse is autistic. A parent who killed their autistic kid may well have been overwhelmed, but killing your kid kind of disqualifies you from sainthood, last I checked. Telling autistic adults that "the parents are important too!" every time we remind them that listening to autistic people isn't saint-like; it's silencing. But they still get the title. If we even explain nicely why that's a problem or why something they did isn't OK, we have a tone to be policed, and it's totally not OK because we couldn't possibly understand.
This double standard needs to stop, yesterday. Or maybe before it even started?

Sunday, November 18, 2012

Uh... That Doesn't Look Good.

So, does anyone know what Autism Rights Watch is? They popped up pretty suddenly. They've only got about 260 likes on Facebook as I write this, which isn't much for an autism advocacy or autism activism organization.
Their 503(c) is still pending, which means they've got to be pretty new.
And... this is the really interesting thing. Autism Speaks and ARW have rather similar terms and conditions in certain areas. By similar, I mean the same with Autism Speaks replaced with ARW, and the evidence that that's where they got it? One spot where it says "ARW Speaks" in the terms. Have a screen shot:



Yes, that worries me.
A legitimate self-advocacy organization would know the problems with Autism Speaks. Sure, a budding one might copy terms from another organization, but if they were really what they are trying to present themselves as, they would copy from someone else. They would copy from someone who is NOT Autism Speaks. Maybe they'd copy from not-autism-speaks or something. Internet copyright things and terms are common enough that they wouldn't even really need to get it from an autism organization if they wanted to be really non-partisan in their choosing.
I don't know. Point is, I don't trust it.
I don't trust anything that even smells like Autism Speaks.
And this group? Well, it's not the first time Autism Speaks has worked with the people who are running Autism Rights Watch.
Sure, they say that they do not support research for a cure, but that doesn't mean I trust them. I don't trust Autism Speaks not to try making a puppet that takes the anti-cure stance in order to compete with someone Autism Speaks doesn't really like (ASAN, perhaps?) I know Autism Speaks has helped fund other projects the same people starting Autism Rights Watch have done. It's not exactly a way to earn my trust, this stuff that I'm seeing.
And of course, they talk about how "sickening" the fighting between ASAN and Autism Speaks is, but I've only ever seen this on articles that portrayed ASAN well. That says something to me- it says that they don't really think ASAN is doing anything good. Complaining about fighting between two organizations only on the page of one is a pretty clear taking of sides. That's what they're doing. Here's one of their posts:


I quite like the "stop talking over us" comment they got on it. Someone noticed that they're condemning the "being pissed at Autism Speaks" thing, which, well, we have every right to be. There's a whole lot of stuff they never apologized for, including Autism Every Day and I am Autism.
And they claimed Henry's success as a victory for Autism Rights Watch. They did do some stuff, but it's not their victory. It's Henry's victory. I don't trust an organization that claims a victory as theirs when they joined it fairly late in the fight. I wrote my post about standing with him and started posting about it and sharing the petition a good bit before they did, and I was late to the party as far as people blogging about it goes. That's not their victory.
Basically, it's great that they are trying to get people to stop it with packing in France because packing is horrible, but take them with a grain of salt. They're not likely to be who and what they've claimed.
Oh, and just so Autism Rights Watch knows: If you really deplore that kind of fight, you can start convincing me by deploring the supporters of Autism Speaks who do things like threatening the protesters, since that's part of the fighting too, and you can start deploring it on things that portray Autism Speaks well, since you do it so well on stuff that portrays ASAN well. Even-handed deploration or accept that you will not be believed. (And yes, I will delete it if you put your cookie-cutter deploration here. Give me something new or be ignored/get no points.)