My university had an academic summit last Friday. I went. There was a breakout session about inclusive pedagogy, which I prepared this for (not as a presenter, as a way of getting my thoughts in order.) My expected audience was mostly administrative type people, so, you know, not the same as the writing exactly what I think as I think it that often happens here. But in case it could be useful for anyone, have at?
One kind of diversity to consider is
disability: look at the statements on accessibility for students with
disabilities we have on our syllabi. This one is from the coordinate course I taught this past fall and will be teaching
this upcoming spring, found on the course website for all sections.
Any student with a
documented disability should contact your instructor early in the
semester so that he or she may work out reasonable accommodations
with you to support your success in this course. Students should also
contact Disability Services for Students: [contact info redacted]. They will determine with you what
accommodations are necessary and appropriate. All information and
documentation is confidential.
Thinking about this in terms of the
the principles of inclusive pedagogy, I am not
satisfied with this sort of statement as status quo. Disability
Services is an office run by people who know more about most
disabilities than the instructors do*-
including them is a good idea. But they will determine with
you what accommodations are necessary and appropriate.
That is, disability services and the student. Where is the teacher
here?
They
sign and then honor**
the “special” modifications known as accommodations, available
only for students with sufficient paperwork to prove they need it.
And then? “Making
accommodations for students with disabilities ensures that the
classroom environment and culture remain the same, absorbing
difference via temporary changes to the status quo for specific
individuals.1”
That's not a sharing of responsibility for learning in a way that
makes disabled students feel welcome- it's a strong statement that
these needs are somehow “special” and that the students don't
really belong here.
For
other kinds of diversity, inclusive pedagogy asks us to go beyond
minimum legal requirements of nondiscrimination. We should do this
for disability as well, starting from what is often the only mention
of disability in a course- the statement on the syllabus. The
question is then- how? How do we change this statement to reflect the
principles of inclusive pedagogy, and how do we change our actions
to match, when a disabled student comes to us?
Preparing
a sample syllabus for a Disability Studies course for engineering
students2,
I made the statement below as one guess. I'd love to hear more ideas
and get feedback on this.
If you anticipate or encounter difficulties
participating in this course or demonstrating your learning because
of any portion of this course or the course environment, I highly
encourage you to contact me as soon as possible so we can discuss
your access needs and how we can meet them. Note that while this is directly
applicable to students who are registered with the disability office
and that accommodations through the disability office will be
honored, you
do not need to disclose a documented disability or provide an
accommodations letter to discuss your access needs.
* This
might not always hold- an instructor with a disability likely knows
more about how to do things with that disability than an abled
person from Disability Services does, for example.
** This
assumes that they do honor the accommodations in the first place.
Instructors do
sometimes refuse to honor the modifications, well aware that most
students with disabilities don't have the resources and know-how to
challenge their refusal. But a teacher who does that probably
isn't claiming to care about inclusive pedagogy.
1 Dolmage,
Jay. “Inviting Disability in the Front Door.” Composing Other
Spaces. Eds. John Tassoni and Douglas Reichert-Powell. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press,
2008. 121-144.
2 No idea when or if the class is going to run. Students can't propose courses at my university, but I'd like to teach it or something like it eventually.
I know the institution where I teach has VERY strict rules about accommodation (a word I despise ANYWAY!). Their stance - and I believe this is rooted in federal policy - is that if any student who does not have legally documented disability and agreed-upon accommodations (yes, by the disabilities coordinator!) receives accommodations ALL students must receive the same. Similarly, if any student who is documented as above receives a DIFFERENT, non-agreed/documented accommodation ALL students must receive that as well. As with so many things about difference, this makes me cray cray. yet i do see where the institution as a rule-following institution is coming from...I am writing as an instructor on the spectrum who has worked with many students with a wide range of differences and similarities and...I do know i am willing to do whatever I can within these confines and pushing them some as a teacher...
ReplyDeleteThanks for this thoughtful post,
I mean, anything I'm doing sans documentation is probably something I'd be willing to do for everyone who wants it, but no way am I going to enforce it on everyone, even those who don't want it.
DeleteBlech on the idea of one size fits all.
I second your blech - from both student and teacher perspectives!
Delete