Note For Anyone Writing About Me

Guide to Writing About Me

I am an Autistic person,not a person with autism. I am also not Aspergers. The diagnosis isn't even in the DSM anymore, and yes, I agree with the consolidation of all autistic spectrum stuff under one umbrella. I have other issues with the DSM.

I don't like Autism Speaks. I'm Disabled, not differently abled, and I am an Autistic activist. Self-advocate is true, but incomplete.

Citing My Posts

MLA: Zisk, Alyssa Hillary. "Post Title." Yes, That Too. Day Month Year of post. Web. Day Month Year of retrieval.

APA: Zisk, A. H. (Year Month Day of post.) Post Title. [Web log post]. Retrieved from

Monday, September 2, 2013

Feminist Wire's Call Translated

It is an optimistic, still super-wordy but with easier words, version of the call for submissions. Apparently someone actually could do that. Yay!Since this one was neither created nor shared by The Feminist Wire, the social media crisis is still on. Details on that found in earlier post.
Because telling disabled people "If you think accessibility matters you do it" isn't acceptable.
Filling their submissions with essays on why that stuff isn't acceptable and on why making sure the people you're "inviting" to contribute can understand the invitation? Totally a good idea.

This is a guest post by Amanda

We have noticed recently that more people in academia have taken an interest in talking about disability. For instance, at a recent conference on "Cripistemologies," people who study disability talked with people who study gender and sexuality about many topics, including animals, chronic pain and injury, and how transgender people express themselves and are seen, especially focusing on their bodies.

We like to bring together different areas of study and talk about how they can work together, and we think it's important to talk about justice and injustice and how they affect how we think. But we're not sure how to feel about the fact that people from other academic fields suddenly want to talk about disability studies, especially since people who study disabilities have been thinking and talking about important things for a long time before now. How does it affect disabled people when people talk about disability as a way to understand the relationships between humans and animals, for example? We need to talk critically about what it means for disabled people when able people use their lives and experiences to make points that aren't about disability justice.

So that's why we thought we needed this forum. We ask: Why are people who didn't talk about disability before talking about it now? Whom does it affect, and how, to talk about disability as part of discussions about other kinds of injustice? Is it harmful to disabled people when able people use their lives and experiences as a metaphor for other things? How will it affect the field of disability studies that already exists, when people in other fields of study start paying attention to it? Will the academic study of disabilities by people in other fields have an effect on the people in disability studies who focus on real-world experiences and meeting real needs? And how can the academic study of disability learn from activists and people who work to improve the lives of disabled people?

We also thought it would be good to talk about disability itself, and we hope this forum will provide a safe space to do so. Here are some questions and ideas we hope the forum will talk about:

What is it like to be disabled in the 21st century? How are disabled people's experiences different because of where they live, the technology they can use, how much money they have, their race, and the fact that some disabilities are invisible?

What different kinds of identities (race, gender, class) are often forgotten when we talk about disability and disabled people's experiences, and what kind of harm does that do?

We think race, class, and gender are the three big ways that people are classified that affect their lives. What's the best way to talk about those without forgetting about or ignoring disabled people's experiences?

How should feminism address disabilities? What is it like to be a disabled feminist?

When we talk about “disability” like it's just one thing, does that cause us to ignore the many different kinds of disabilities and the many different experiences of disabled people?

What are some good and bad things about crip feminism?

What are good things that people and organizations do now to challenge ableism?

What is disability? What does it mean to be disabled?

Which people and what topics are missing from the conversation about disability?

How do other kinds of discrimination and injustice interact with ableism?

We welcome you to submit things you have written or created on the topic of disability. We want all kinds of submissions, even visual art! Our guidelines and submission form are here (link to accessible guidelines incorporating all the requirements for this specific forum AND the general ones, and if possible, make these less annoying). If you have questions about something you'd like to submit, email us at

If you'd like to send us a submission, please send it by October 10, 2013. The forum will be in late October and early November.

And have a link pile of all the posts relevant. Including this post.

1 comment:

  1. Here via Mama Be Good. I'm not involved enough in disability activism to understand exactly what is cognitive accessibility, but I like it that the Call got translated. Thansk Amanda. To me it's sitll too overwhelming, but that could be because I'm not too knowledgeable about disability studies. It's a sheme TFW is not endorsing or sharing this. Actually, they should've made the accommodation themselves.


I reserve the right to delete comments for personal attacks, derailing, dangerous comparisons, bigotry, and generally not wanting my blog to be a platform for certain things.