I'm reading Disability in Science Fiction: Representations of Technology as Cure. It's edited by Kathryn Allan. EasyBib tells me the citation for the book as a whole is this:
Allan, Kathryn. Disability in Science Fiction: Representations of Technology as Cure. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Print.
Anyways, my notes from reading the introduction, chapter 1, and chapter 2 are below.
Introduction: Reading Disability in
Science Fiction, Kathryn Allan, 1-15
Synder, Sharon L. and David T.
Mitchell. Cultural Locations of Disability.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006. Print.
“Disability is a difference that
exists only to be undone”
(190, emphasis in original.)
Peace,
William J. “Slippery Slopes: Media, Disability, and Adaptive
Sports.” The Body Reader.
Ed. Jean Moore and Mary Kosut. New York: New York University Press,
2010. 332-344. Print.
“People with
disabilities have embraced the internet with gusto and have formed a
vibrant cyber community. Disability studies scholars have also
embraced the internet, but their communication and scholarship is
restricted and exclusionary. This is a significant problem” (343.)
Quayson,
Ato. Aesthetic Nervousness: Disability and the Crisis of
Representation. New York:
Columbia University Press, 2007. Print.
Quayson identifies
nine main categories of disability representation: “
- Disability as null set and/or moral test
- Disability as interface with otherness (race, class, social identity)
- Disability as articulation of disjuncture between thematic and narrative vectors
- Disability as bearer of moral deficit/evil
- Disability as epiphany
- Disability as signifier of ritual insight
- Disability as inarticulable and enigmatic tragic insight
- Disability as hermeneutical impasse
- Disability as normality” (52.)
Chapter 1: Tools to
Help You Think: Intersections between Disability Studies and the
Writings of Samuel R. Delany. Joanne Woiak and Hioni Karamanos. 19-33
Basically I need to
read Samuel R. Delany's stuff, because good sci fi and yeah.
Delany, Samuel R.
The Einstein Intersection. 1967.
Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press, 1998. Print.
Empire Star.
New York: Bantam, 1966. Print.
Pages
114-115 of The Einstein Intersection
apparently has really good stuff in it.
“The stories give you a law to follow--”
“--that you can either break or obey.”
And in
Empire Star: “The
only important elements in any society are the artistic and the
criminal, becayse they alone, by questioning the society's values,
can force it to change” (103.)
Oh hey, I want to
quote a chapter author directly rather than wanting the quote they
wanted too from someone else.
Mainstream
diversity courses routinely reproduce the exclusion of disability,
treating it as an “add-on” to race, class, and gender. The
Einstein Intersection, by
contrast, illustrates how disability is used to justify other
intersecting forms of inequality. For example, in the village, full
participation as a sexual and gendered being depends on status as a
“functional norm,” while in the city, wealth and class status are
tied to making disability invisible. (32)
Chapter 2: Freaks
and Extraordinary Bodies: Disability as Generic Marker in John
Varley's “Tango Charlie and Foxtrot Romeo.” Ria Cheyne. 35-46
“In
deciding to have the tattoo, Galloway foregrounds her cyborg status
and resists normalization” (38.) This is in reference to a
character who, in a sense, cured herself (funded the research used in
her cure) but still choses to emphasize her status as having
been disabled. In the same
story, two former murderers are under “amparole,” with prosthetic
arms made to be light, airy, and beautiful, as well as refusing to
pick up a knife or gun.
Gosling,
Ju. “Towards a Scientific Model of Disability.” Abnormal.
N.p., 2009. Web. http://www.ju90.co.uk/nimr/model.htm,
needs read, probably needs used in the engineering version along with
medical and social models when introducting the models. Ooooh. See
also links to other models here.
http://www.ju90.co.uk/nimr/bground.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment
I reserve the right to delete comments for personal attacks, derailing, dangerous comparisons, bigotry, and generally not wanting my blog to be a platform for certain things.